/ Developer

Open Sourcing Bloom’s Phase 1 Contracts

At the conclusion of our token sale tomorrow, we’re releasing the Phase 1 main net dApp for Bloom. In celebration of this event, we’ve published our Phase 1 contracts on GitHub today!

Bloom is a community first project. We’re thrilled to open source our contracts for public review and discussion. This marks a big milestone on our long term roadmap and we’re incredibly excited to continue to make progress on defining the future of credit.

This post is a technical overview, we have an article on how you can use your BLT tokens which is a non-technical read if you’re looking to get started with the token.

We’ve put together a description of the most important contracts in this post to help guide you through the code and to give you a lower-level overview on interacting with these contracts without a UI in case you’re interested in joining Bloom development or experimenting with the system.

Creating an Account

When the account system is initially launched, only the creator of the contract has an account. An owner of BLT (Alice) can visit Bloom’s dApp in order to create an account. If Alice successfully requests an account via the dApp, a special “invite admin” account we own will create an account for her via our AccountRegistry#createAccount function.

The user provides the ETH address they would like to associate with their account along with a signature proving they own the address:

// Example code for create account

const address = web3.eth.accounts[0];
const signature = web3.personal.sign(web3.toHex("Hello, Bloom!"), address);

fetch("https://example.hellobloom.io/signup/", {
  method: "post",
  body: JSON.stringify({ address, signature })
});

If everything checks out on the backend, the function is called on the contract from the admin account:

// Example code on backend

accountRegistry.createAccount(address, { from: inviteAdmin });

Inviting Another User

If Alice wants to invite another user (Bob) who doesn’t own BLT, she can use the invite system. During the early stages of the protocol, we require that users lockup a small amount of BLT in order to create an invite. They can reclaim it after 1 year if as long as they don’t do something malicious like exit scam the network. The account registry will handle transfering and holding the BLT once the invite is created, but the user has to allow the invite system to transfer the BLT on their behalf first:

// Example code for allowing the "invite collateralizer" to transfer BLT for the user

// `blt` is the contract instance for our ERC20 token
blt.approve(
  // `inviteCollateralizer` is the contract instance for the contract that handles token lockup and release
  inviteCollateralizer.address,
  // `inviteCollateralizer.collateralAmount` is a function that returns how much BLT is required to make an invite right now
  await inviteCollateralizer.collateralAmount()
);

I don’t know any of my friends’ Ethereum addresses, so Alice shouldn’t have to know Bob’s either in order to invite him. Instead, Alice generates a shared secret just for this invite. Using the shared secret, she signs her own address and calls the createInvite function on the account registry.

// Example code for creating an invite

// This signAddress function exists in the repo! Checkout https://git.io/vb1hc
const { signAddress } = require("./src/signAddress");
const ethereumjsWallet = require("ethereumjs-wallet");

// Generate the shared secret using the ethereumjs-wallet library
const signingKeypair = ethereumjsWallet.generate();
const signingPrivateKey = signingKeypair.getPrivateKey();

// Sign the address associated with our Bloom account using the
// new shared secret
const inviteSignature = signAddress({
  address: web3.eth.accounts[0],
  privKey: signingPrivateKey
});

// Submit this signature to the contract
accountRegistry.createInvite(inviteSignature);

When the contract receives the createInvite call, it uses ecrecover to derive the associated public key for the signature. This is saved in the contract under the invites field so if we want we could look it up to see the invite status:

// Example code for looking up an invite

// Get the address string from the keypair we generated before
const signingAddressString = signingKeypair.getAddressString();

// Lookup the invite
const inviteStruct = await accountRegistry.invites(signingAddressString);

const inviter = inviteStruct[0];   // Should be Alice's address
const recipient = inviteStruct[1]; // Should be 0x0 until Bob accepts

Sharing an Invite

A private invite for another user is facilitated via the shared secret generated specifically for the invite.

After Alice submits her signature via the createInvite function, she should securely send the shared secret out of band with Bob. This invite model intentionally makes a tradeoff for the sake of user experience: if the shared secret is leaked to a malicious third party before the invite is accepted then the attacker can claim the user's invite. This is an important compromise to make in order to support an invite system that doesn't require knowing the ETH address of the user you are inviting. Requiring the inviter to know the recipients addres would add significant friction to onboarding new users.

A well-built dApp can design the invite experience to reduce the risk of malicious users claiming invites. For example, when Alice creates an invite, the dApp can generate the shared secret and sign Alice’s address server side. The invite can be stored along side a normal identifier such that Bob only has to visit https://example.hellobloom.io/invite/123. When Bob provides the address he would like to use on Bloom's platform, his address can be signed server side as well using the shared secret. As a final precaution, before Bob accepts the invite, the dApp can ask him to confirm his email by sending an additional confirmation link before signing his invite. This dApp architecture increases the cost significantly for stealing Bloom invites. Now an attacker would need to compromise our centralized database and also access the email accounts for each user with a pending invite.

Accepting an Invite

When Bob receives his shared secret via the process described above, all he has to do is sign his own address using the shared secret and submit that signature to acceptInvite. The code for this signing process is identical to the "Inviting another User" section except Bob doesn't need to generate a new key.

Accepting an invite is not vulnerable to transaction front running since the acceptInvite transaction is not revealing the secret. A malicious user could not simply submit the same signature to our account registry because the contract recovers signing public key from the signature by computing keccak256(msg.sender).

Creating a Poll

Bloom’s protocol relies on community voting to make important protocol decisions. Anyone can create a Poll in the Bloom network by interacting with the VotingCenter contract. You don't have to have a Bloom account to create a poll, but the dApp will filter the polls it displays to include polls created by community members.

For example, if Alice wanted to create a very simple poll within the Bloom network, it might look like this:

// Example code for make a poll

// This module exists in the repo! Checkout https://git.io/vbMUl
const ipfsUtils = require("./src/ipfs");

// Create a connection to IFPS
const IPFS = require("ipfs-mini");
const ipfs = new IPFS({
  host: "ipfs.infura.io",
  port: 5001,
  protocol: "https"
});

// Poll data we want to store
const poll = {
  title: "What kind of ice cream should I buy?",
  description: "I am hosting a party soon and I need to decide!",
  choices: ["Vanilla", "Chocolate", "Strawberry"]
};

// Write the data to IPFS
ipfs.addJSON(poll, (err, ipfsMultihash) => {
  if (err) throw err;

// On success, create the poll via the voting center
  votingCenter.createPoll(
    ipfsUtils.toHex(ipfsMultihash),
    poll.choices.length,
    +new Date() / 1000 + 60 * 5, // start in 5 minutes
    +new Date() / 1000 + 60 * 60 * 24 * 7 // end the poll in 1 week
  );
});

Creating the poll via the voting center helps Bloom track which polls are meant to be part of the network. Each Poll is its own contract which people can interact with.

The poll information is stored in IPFS since it would be too constly to store on the contract itself. We store the IPFS multihash with the Poll though so that anyone can recreate their own voting dApp if they would like.

Voting in a Poll

Weighing in on a poll within the bloom network is easy. All you do is call the vote function on the corresponding Pollcontract with the number of the choice you want (so if I called vote(1) in the previous example I would have voted for Vanilla).

You can get a list of all polls from the VotingCenter contract by calling the polls() function. Using the author field on the Poll contract, you can do whatever filtering you want. We expect to start with two types of filters:

  1. Polls created by Bloom staff
  2. Polls created by Bloom users

Anyonce can vote on a poll. The weighting and scoring mechanisms are not enforced on chain. We will evaluate polls by looking at the BLT balance of each voter at the end of the poll. Therefore, Alice can vote on a poll and acquire more BLT before the vote closes in order to increase her voice. If she wants, she can always change her vote until the poll closes.


If you have any questions about how these contracts work, please join us on our Slack!

Open Sourcing Bloom’s Phase 1 Contracts
Share this